October 29, 2026, opinions

Designated for publication Higginson, J. (Smith, Higginson, Wilson) (no oral argument), criminal, appeal waiver On remand from U.S. Supreme Court, dismissing appeal of conviction and sentence on basis of appeal waiver in plea agreement. Rashon Harris pleaded guilty to possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute under 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) and received a 240-month … More October 29, 2026, opinions

June 30, 2026, opinions

Designated for publication Duncan, J. (Jones, Duncan, Douglas), Douglas, J., dissenting (oral argument); administrative law, nondelegation doctrine, Seventh Amendment, major questions doctrine Granting petition for review of HHS enforcement order imposing fine for selling of unauthorized vaping products, and vacting decision. Texas Tobacco Barn (TTB), a Lubbock, Texas vape shop, applied for FDA premarket authorization … More June 30, 2026, opinions

May 23, 2023, opinions

Designated for publication Richman, C.J. (Richman, Smith, Graves), excessive force, false arrest Affirming dismissal of § 1983 claims arising from arrest of plaintiff for driving while intoxicated. The Court held that there was probable cause for the plaintiff’s arrest, based on the admitted facts, such that the district court did not err in finding that … More May 23, 2023, opinions

May 11-16, 2023, opinions

Designated for publication Higginson, J. (Richman, King, Higginson), criminal, sentencing, Speedy Trial Act Affirming convictions and 540-month sentence for armed robberies of cell phone stores. The Court held that there was no Speedy Trial Act violation where the defendant’s counsel sought a continuance on the indictment past the Act’s 30-day deadline, holding that the Government … More May 11-16, 2023, opinions

September 30, 2022, opinions

Designated for publication Smith, J. (Smith, Duncan, Oldham), Oldham, J., dissenting; immigration Denying Mexican citizen’s petition for review of BIA order dismissing appeal of IJ order that IJ lacked jurisdiction to decide application for cancelation of a reinstatement of removal under the Violence Against Women Act. The Court held that, under the rule of orderliness, … More September 30, 2022, opinions