Designated for publication Elrod, C.J. (Elrod, Smith, Wilson) (oral argument), bankruptcy Affirming bankruptcy court’s finding of willful violation of bankruptcy automatic stay by aggressive arbitration against debtor’s founder. With Purpose, Inc. (formerly doing business as GloriFi), a financial technology start-up co-founded by Toby Neugebauer, filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in February 2023. Prior to the … More July 16, 2026, opinions
Designated for publication Willett, J. (Stewart, Willett, Wilson) (no oral argument), Stewart, J., dissenting in part; mandamus, appellate jurisdiction, voluntary dismissal, school desegregation Dismissing appeal for lack of jurisdiction over judgment that was entered after voluntary dismissal of school desegregation case, and granting mandamus vacating post-dismissal judgment. This school-desegregation case had been pending for more … More July 13-15, 2026, decisions
Designated for publication Clement, J. (Jones, Clement, Richman) (oral argument), criminal, sentencing Affirming 180-month sentence on conviction of selling methamphetamine that was based on a criminal history score that included an expunged state conviction. Juan Payne pleaded guilty to selling methamphetamine (461.9 grams in two transactions) under 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A). While his … More July 10, 2026, opinions
Designated for publication Willett, J. (Higginson, Willett, Engelhardt) (oral argument at original panel stage), preemption, taking, Contracts Clause Granting petition for panel rehearing and substituting for February 9, 2026, panel opinion, affirming summary judgment for Louisiana on pharmaceutical companies’ and trade group’s challenge to Louisiana statute on drug purchases. Pharmaceutical manufacturers AbbVie, AstraZeneca, and trade … More July 1-7, 2026, opinions
Designated for publication Smith, J. (Smith, Graves, Engelhardt) (oral argument), habeas corpus, First Amendment, ineffective assistance of counsel Affirming denial of habeas relief. Irving Davis raped and murdered 15-year-old Melissa Medina in 2001, cutting off her fingertips to prevent DNA identification. He was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death; the Texas Court of … More June 25-26, 2026, opinions
Designated for publication Douglas, J. (Southwick, Higginson, Douglas) (oral argument), trade secrets, RICO Reversing dismissal of plaintiff’s RICO/theft-of-trade-secrets claim, and remanding for further proceedings. EnvTech, Inc. is a company that developed a confidential proprietary one-step chemical formula and cleaning process for hydrofluoric acid alkylation (“HF alky”) units in oil refineries, controlling roughly 80% of the … More June 9 2026, opinions
Designated for publication per curiam (Haynes, Ho, Oldham) (no oral argument), Ho, J., concurring; Oldham, J., concurring; criminal, Second Amendment Affirming conviction of possession of a firearm by a felon. Peter Villa Cordova pled guilty to possessing a firearm after a felony conviction in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). His prior felony convictions include … More May 20, 2026, opinions
Unpublished decisions per curiam (Stewart, Willett, Wilson) (no oral argument), habeas corpus Dismissing as frivolous appeal from dismissal of § 2244 petition challenging convictions for receipt and possession of child pornography, and whether his actual-innocence claim satisfied the savings clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e). Relying on Jones v. Hendrix, 599 U.S. 465 (2023), the … More May 19, 2026, opinions
Designated for publication Jones, J. (Jones, Duncan, Douglas) (no oral argument), Americans with Disabilities Act Affirming dismissal of ADA claims. Albert Hayes worked as an IT systems administrator for Army contractor GStek at Fort Polk. After COVID-era telework ended and he was required to return to the office, Hayes was diagnosed with Autism, Major Depressive … More May, 8, 11, 12, 2026 opinions
Designated for publication Oldham, J. (single judge) (no oral argument), habeas corpus Denying motion for certificate of appealability from district court’s denial of Rule 60(b) motion construed as an unauthorized successive § 2255 motion. At issue was (1) whether the court could issue a COA when the applicant’s claims do not implicate the denial of … More May 6, 2026, opinions
