Designated for publication Smith, J. (Smith, Southwick, Higginson), labor law Granting petition for review of NLRB order ruling that Tesla infringed on employees’ rights to unionize when it required employees to wear specific Tesla uniforms and prohibited employees from wearing union-insignia t-shirts instead (though the policy allowed employees to wear as many union stickers on … More November 14, 2023, opinions
Designated for publication Southwick, J. (Stewart, Dennis, Southwick), habeas corpus Affirming district court judgment granting sec. 2241 petition on holding that Louisiana state prisoner had a state-created liberty interest in parole that had been granted under Louisiana law, in suit arising from rescission of that parole just prior to its effective date. The Court first … More October 23, 2023, opinions
Designated for publication per curiam (en banc court), voting rights, Eighth Amendment, Equal Protection, standing, sovereign immunity, Ex parte Young Granting en banc rehearing, and vacating August 4, 2023, panel opinion that reversed in part and affirmed in part district court’s dismissal of constitutional challenge to Mississippi’s permanent disenfranchisement of certain felons. Duncan, J. (Duncan, … More September 28-29, 2023, opinions
Designated for publication Duncan, J. (Duncan, Wilson, Schroeder, by designation), criminal, attorney-client privilege Affirming convictions of defendant on numerous drug offenses related to ownership of pharmacy that was essentially an illegal pill mill; upholding use of audio recordings by the prosecution (though not used at trial) that defendant asserted intruded into his privileged conversations with … More September 26, 2023, opinions
Designated for publication Oldham, J. (Dennis, Engelhardt, Oldham), Title VII, employment discrimination Reversing summary judgment dismissal of employee’s discrimination claims after he was fired for his refusal to cut his hair and beard in violation of his religious vow, in light of Groff v. DeJoy, 143 S. Ct. 2279 (2023). The Court held that the … More September 15, 2023, opinions
Designated for publication Jones, J. (Jones, Stewart, Duncan), criminal, jury instructions, sentencing Affirming conviction of illegal reentry and 105-month sentence, finding no error in jury instruction or impropriety in enhancement of sentence for obstruction of justice. After the defendant had presented evidence that he had been acting under duress due to threats by the drug-smuggling … More September 14, 2023, opinions
Designated for publication per curiam (Richman, Jones, Smith, Stewart, Elrod, Haynes, Higginson, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, Douglas), legislative privilege, appellate jurisdiction, standing Vacating August 25, 2023 panel opinion (which had been substituted for withdrawn MAy 10, 2023 panel opinion), and ordering en banc rehearing of district court’s order that Mississippi legislators must provide a … More August 29, 2023, opinions
Designated for publication Ho, J. (Jones, Ho, Wilson), administrative law, standing Granting petition for review of NRC order, and vacating license for temporary storage for spent nuclear fuel, holding that the NRC does not have authority under the Atomic Energy Act to license temporary nuclear waste storage facilities. The Court first held that the petitioners … More August 25, 2023, opinions
Designated for publication Jones, J. (Jones, Willett, Douglas), Douglas, J., dissenting; habeas corpus, ineffective assistance of counsel Affirming denial of petitioner’s § 2255 petition on IAC claim arising from trial counsel’s inadequate argument and appellate counsel’s lack of argument for “back time” credit on sentence for possession of a firearm by a felon to account … More August 16, 2023, opinions
Designated for publication per curiam (Smith, Higginson, Willett), attorney discipline Affirming three-judge district court panel’s decision imposing a 12-month suspension from practice in front of that court after substance-abuse-related inappropriate courtroom behavior and failures to show up for clients’ sentencing hearings. The Court rejected the attorney’s argument that only the presiding judge can impose sanctions … More August 11-14, 2023, opinions
