Tag: sentencing

October 2-3, 2023, opinions

October 4, 2023

Designated for publication Richman, C.J. (Richman, Wiener, Willett), criminal, Anti-Kickback Statute, sufficiency of evidence, Travel Act, Speedy Trial Act, Bruton violation, Court Reporter’s Act, jury instructions, prosecutorial conduct, sentencing, restitution The Court upheld the sufficiency of evidence to support the Anti-Kickback Statute convictions of six co-defendants, holding that the government need not prove defendants had … More October 2-3, 2023, opinions

September 28-29, 2023, opinions

October 2, 2023

Designated for publication per curiam (en banc court), voting rights, Eighth Amendment, Equal Protection, standing, sovereign immunity, Ex parte Young Granting en banc rehearing, and vacating August 4, 2023, panel opinion that reversed in part and affirmed in part district court’s dismissal of constitutional challenge to Mississippi’s permanent disenfranchisement of certain felons. Duncan, J. (Duncan, … More September 28-29, 2023, opinions

September 27, 2023, opinions

September 28, 2023

Designated for publication Wilson, J. (Smith, Clement, Wilson), WARN Act, summary judgment, jury right Appellate counsel from Fishman Haygood represented prevailing party. Affirming in part and reversing in part summary judgment dismissal of employees’ WARN Act claims against investment advisor of plaintiffs’ employer on violations of WARN Act. The Court affirmed the district court’s holding … More September 27, 2023, opinions

September 25, 2023, opinions

September 26, 2023

Designated for publication per curiam (Smith, Southwick, Higginson), criminal, sentencing, Armed Career Criminal Act Affirming 190-month sentence on conviction of possession of a firearm by a felon, as enhanced for under the Armed Career Criminal Act. Teh Court rejected the defendant’s argument that the facts of the prior convictions for purposes of the ACCA enhancement … More September 25, 2023, opinions

September 22, 2023, opinions

September 25, 2023

Unpublished per curiam (Jones, Stewart, Duncan), prisoner suit Affirming dismissal of Texas state prisoner’s § 1983 claims. per curiam (Jolly, Dennis, Higginson), False Claims Act, qui tam Affirming in part and reversing in part dismissal of False Claims Act qui tam claims against housing authority and property management companies for federal housing regulations violations and … More September 22, 2023, opinions

September 18, 2023, opinions

September 19, 2023

Unpublished per curiam (Smith, Higginson, Engelhardt), Title VII, employment discrimination, Americans with Disabilities Act Affirming summary judgment dismissal of various employment discrimination claims. per curiam (Stewart, Southwick, Engelhardt), criminal, sentencing Affirming 96-month sentence on conviction of possession of a firearm by a felon. per curiam (Jolly, Engelhardt, Douglas), criminal Granting Anders motion to withdraw, and … More September 18, 2023, opinions

September 14, 2023, opinions

September 15, 2023

Designated for publication Jones, J. (Jones, Stewart, Duncan), criminal, jury instructions, sentencing Affirming conviction of illegal reentry and 105-month sentence, finding no error in jury instruction or impropriety in enhancement of sentence for obstruction of justice. After the defendant had presented evidence that he had been acting under duress due to threats by the drug-smuggling … More September 14, 2023, opinions

September 13, 2023, opinions

September 14, 2023

Designated for publication Smith, J. (Smith, Southwick, Higginson), Higginson, J., concurring; habeas corpus Affirming denial of § 2255 petition seeking relief from guilty plea to possession with intent to distribute a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine on IAC grounds. The Court held that the petitioner had not forfeited his argument about … More September 13, 2023, opinions

September 8-11, 2023, opinions

September 12, 2023

Designated for publication Higginson, J. (Smith, Southwick, Higginson), criminal, supervised release Affirming imposition of 15 “standard conditions” for terms of supervised release from district court’s Standing Order, where oral pronouncement included that the supervised release would be “subject to the standard conditions” but did not otherwise expressly articulate those conditions. Elrod, J. (Dennis, Elrod, Ho), … More September 8-11, 2023, opinions