Designated for publication per curiam (Clement, Haynes, Oldham), Equal Protection Clause Affirming summary judgment dismissal of plaintiff’s Equal Protection Clause claims arising from being struck during jury voir dire. Based on the summary judgment evidence, the Court held that the plaintiffs “cannot show the Caddo Parish prosecutors dismissed them solely by reason of their race.” … More April 11, 2024, opinions
Designated for publication per curiam (King, Ho, Engelhardt), criminal, search and seizure, Miranda rights Affirming conviction of possession with intent to distribute heroin, fentanyl, and cocaine, upholding denial of motion to suppress. The Court held that the record contained sufficient evidence of probable cause to conduct a warrantless search of the defendant’s vehicle, obviating the … More April 5-8, 2024, opinions
Designated for publication Willett, J. (Willett, Wilson, Ramirez), breach of contract Affirming summary judgment in favor of defendant on plaintiff’s breach of contract and fraud claims arising from alleged breach of supplier-exclusivity agreement between defendant and plaintiff’s predecessor-in-interest. The Court held that the plaintiff’s breach of contract claim was time-barred on its face, and that … More April 3, 2024, opinions
Unpublished per curiam (King, Haynes, Graves), criminal Granting Anders motion to withdraw, and dismissing appeal. per curiam (King, Haynes, Graves), criminal, sentencing Affirming 88-month sentence on conviction of conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance. per curiam (King, Ho, Engelhardt), attorney discipline Remanding order of nine-month extension of suspension … More March 25, 2024, opinions
Designated for publication Southwick, J. (Stewart, Dennis, Southwick), receivership Granting petition for panel rehearing of original panel decision that affirmed the district court’s denial of motions for $79 million set-off from order allowing receiver to recover from an investor in Stanford Ponzi scheme, where panel had affirmed on basis that investor had failed to timely … More March 20, 2024, opinions
Designated for publication per curiam (voting against en banc rehearing: Jones, Smith, Stewart, Southwick, Haynes, Higginson, Willett, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, Wilson, JJ.; voting for en banc rehearing: Richman, Elrod, Graves, Ho, Douglas, JJ.; recused: Ramirez, J.); Graves, J., dissenting from denial of en banc rehearing; ERISA Denying en banc rehearing of panel opinion reversing district … More March 15, 2024, opinions
Designated for publication Stewart, J. (Jones, Stewart, Duncan), labor law Denying in part and granting in part petition for review of NLRB decision that the petitioner’s RN Case Managers are not NLRA-exempt supervisors and that the petitioner violated the NLRA by creating an impermissible oral workplace rule, threatening employees who exercised protected activity, interrogating staff … More March 7, 2024, opinions
Designated for publication per curiam (voting against en banc rehearing: Richman, Jones, Smith, Southwick, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, Wilson; voting for en banc rehearing: Stewart, Elrod, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Douglas, Ramirez); Elrod, J., dissenting (joined by Stewart, Graves, Higginson, Douglas, JJ.); Douglas, J., dissenting (joined by Graves, Higginson, JJ., and by Elrod, J., as … More February 29, 2024, opinions
Unpublished per curiam (Jones, Barksdale, Elrod), Elrod, J., concurring; criminal, sentencing, sufficiency of evidence Affirming convictions and sentences on drug trafficking-related charges related to sales of drugs by defendants in one of the defendants’ nightclubs. Judge Elrod concurred, opining that, while the admission of certain testimony and a redacted statement were harmless error, they “nevertheless … More February 28, 2024, opinions
Designated for publication Jones, J. (Jones, Wilson, Douglas), Jones, J., concurring; habeas corpus, Brady violation, due process Denying motion for permission to file a successive § 2254 petition by capital inmate to urge Brady violations regarding potentially impeaching evidence as to testimony from the petitioner’s girlfriend and due process violations regarding the petitioner’s request for … More February 27, 2024, opinions
