Designated for publication per curiam (Clement, Haynes, Oldham), Equal Protection Clause Affirming summary judgment dismissal of plaintiff’s Equal Protection Clause claims arising from being struck during jury voir dire. Based on the summary judgment evidence, the Court held that the plaintiffs “cannot show the Caddo Parish prosecutors dismissed them solely by reason of their race.” … More April 11, 2024, opinions
Designated for publication Elrod, J. (joined by Richman, Jones, Smith, Stewart, Haynes, Higginson, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, Douglas, Ramirez, JJ.) (Judges Southwick, Graves, and Wilson recused); Dennis, J., concurring in judgment only (joined by Higginson, Ramirez, JJ.); Ho, J., concurring (joined by Stewart, Elrod, Higginson, Ramirez, JJ.); mootness, appellate jurisdiction, standing In en banc … More April 1-2, 2024, opinions
Unpublished per curiam (Jones, Southwick, Ho), prisoner suit Affirming dismissal of Texas state prisoner’s suit as frivolous. per curiam (Wiener, Stewart, Douglas), criminal, sentencing Affirming imposition of standard supervised release terms as part of sentence for conviction of kidnapping, carjacking, and transportation of a stolen vehicle in interstate commerce. per curiam (Jolly, Smith, Haynes), criminal … More March 27-30, 2024, opinions
Designated for publication Clement, J. (Clement, Engelhardt, Oldham), prisoner suit Vacating dismissal of Texas state prisoner’s Eighth Amendment claim based on chronic sleep deprivation, where prison’s schedule only allowed three and a half hours of interrupted sleep, and remanding for further proceedings. The Court held that the district court applied the wrong standard when it … More March 22, 2024, opinions
Designated for publication per curiam (voting against en banc rehearing: Jones, Smith, Stewart, Southwick, Haynes, Higginson, Willett, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, Wilson, JJ.; voting for en banc rehearing: Richman, Elrod, Graves, Ho, Douglas, JJ.; recused: Ramirez, J.); Graves, J., dissenting from denial of en banc rehearing; ERISA Denying en banc rehearing of panel opinion reversing district … More March 15, 2024, opinions
Designated for publication per curiam (voting against en banc rehearing: Richman, Jones, Smith, Elrod, Haynes, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Wilson; voting for en banc rehearing: Stewart, Southwick, Graves, Higginson, Willett, Douglas, Ramirez; recused: Oldham, J.); Jones, J., concurring in denial of rehearing (joined by Smith, Elrod, Ho, Engelhardt, Wilson, JJ.); Higginson, J., dissenting from denial of … More March 14, 2024, opinions
Designated for publication Duncan, J. (Richman, Haynes, Duncan), Administrative Procedures Act, preemption, healthcare law Affirming in part and reversing in part district court’s judgment that Title X of the Public Health Service Act violates the plaintiff’s constitutional right to consent to the provision of contraceptive care to his minor daughters and that a regulation promulgated … More March 11-12, 2024, opinions
Designated for publication per curiam (Richman, Higginbotham, Elrod), unfair trade practices, improper argument Reversing judgment on jury verdict in favor of defendant in unfair trade practices claim, and remanding for further proceedings, on the basis that “the Defendants’ counsels’ closing argument irreparably prejudiced the fairness of the trial.” The Court held that “legitimate ‘oratory’ and … More March 8, 2024, opinions
Designated for publication Stewart, J. (Jones, Stewart, Duncan), labor law Denying in part and granting in part petition for review of NLRB decision that the petitioner’s RN Case Managers are not NLRA-exempt supervisors and that the petitioner violated the NLRA by creating an impermissible oral workplace rule, threatening employees who exercised protected activity, interrogating staff … More March 7, 2024, opinions
Designated for publication per curiam (Jones, Haynes, Douglas, JJ.), prisoner suit Granting stay pending appeal of remedial order regarding medical care and ADA compliance affecting state prisoners. Unpublished per curiam (King, Haynes, Graves), criminal, sentencing Affirming 60-month sentence on conviction of illegal reentry. per curiam (Jolly, Higginson, Duncan), criminal, compassionate release Affirming denial of motion … More March 6, 2024, opinions
