Designated for publication Douglas, J. (Wiener, Willett, Douglas), Wiener, J., dissenting; habeas corpus, ineffective assistance of counsel Affirming district court’s denial of § 2255 petition, holding that petitioner failed to show that he was prejudiced by his trial and appellate counsel’s performance in guilty-plea conviction of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 50 grams … More March 1, 2024, opinions
Designated for publication Dennis, J. (Stewart, Dennis, Higginson), Higginson, J., dissenting; False Claims Act Affirming dismissal for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction of former employee’s False Claims Act claims against former employer, claiming retaliation for reporting fraudulent misrepresentations made to the Navy, and summary judgment dismissal of remaining claim; holding that “the district court correctly held … More February 14-16, 2024, opinions
Designated for publication Graves, J. (Graves, Higginson, Ho), habeas corpus, ineffective assistance of counsel Reversing denial of § 2255 petition that asserted ineffective assistance of counsel on basis of trial attorney’s failure to consult with defendant regarding filing of appeal, and remanding for further proceedings. The Court held that it was unreasonable for his trial … More January 24-25, 2024, opinions
Designated for publication Duncan, J. (Smith, Higginson, Duncan), habeas corpus, ineffective assistance of counsel Affirming denial of stay for habeas petitioner to return to state court to exhaust a procedurally defaulted IAC claim, denying additional certificate of appealability on IAC claim, and affirming denial of habeas relief on petitioner’s claim that state trial judge committed … More January 15-17, 2024, opinions
Designated for publication Ho, J. (Graves, Higginson, Ho), qualified immunity Dismissing for lack of appellate jurisdiction appeal from denial of qualified immunity summary judgment in excessive force claim. As Judge Ho summarized the opinion: “Two established principles of law govern this qualified immunity appeal. First, it may be objectively reasonable under certain circumstances for police … More January 10, 2024, opinions
Designated for publication Higginbotham, J. (Higginbotham, Smith, Elrod), Smith, J., dissenting; criminal, sentencing, Armed Career Criminal Act, habeas corpus On defendant’s § 2255 motion, vacating sentence on conviction of possession of a firearm by a felon, and remanding for resentencing without the ACCA enhancement. On a 2011 charge for possession of a firearm by a … More December 5, 2023, opinions
Designated for publication per curiam (Richman, Higginbotham, Southwick), habeas corpus, ineffective assistance of counsel Affirming denial of habeas relief on IAC claims of petitioner convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death. per curiam (en banc court), criminal, sufficiency of evidence Ordering en banc rehearing of June 7, 2023, panel opinion that reversed and vacated … More August 30-31, 2023, opinions
Designated for publication per curiam (Richman, Jones, Smith, Stewart, Elrod, Haynes, Higginson, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, Douglas), legislative privilege, appellate jurisdiction, standing Vacating August 25, 2023 panel opinion (which had been substituted for withdrawn MAy 10, 2023 panel opinion), and ordering en banc rehearing of district court’s order that Mississippi legislators must provide a … More August 29, 2023, opinions
Designated for publication per curiam (Richman, Jones, Stewart, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Willett, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, Douglas, JJ., voting against rehearing; Smith, Elrod, Ho, JJ., voting for rehearing); Ho, J., dissenting from denial of rehearing en banc (joined by Smith, J.); § 1983 Denying rehearing en banc of panel opinion that affirmed dismissal of § 1983 … More August 23, 2023, opinions
Designated for publication Jones, J. (Higginbotham, Jones, Oldham), Oldham, J., dissenting; habeas corpus, prosecutorial misconduct, ineffective assistance of counsel Reversing in part and affirming in part denial of § 2255 petition; reversing district court’s application of procedural bar to claim of breach of plea agreement by Assistant U.S. Attorneys, but affirming disposition of IAC claim. … More August 17, 2023, opinions
