Designated for publication Jones, J. (Jones, Stewart, Duncan), breach of contract, fraudulent inducement Reversing judgment and $1.6 billion in combined compensatory and punitive damages in favor of plaintiff on breach of contract and fraudulent inducement claims, holding that liability determination was in error. The Court held that IBM’s actions in replacing BMC mainframe software on … More April 30, 2024, opinions
Designated for publication per curiam (voting against en banc rehearing: Richman, Stewart, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Willett, Douglas, Ramirez; voting for en banc rehearing: Jones, Smith, Elrod, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, Wilson); Willett, J., concurring in denial of en banc rehearing; Ho, J., dissenting from denial of en banc rehearing; Oldham, J., dissenting from denial … More April 16-22, 2024, opinions
Designated for publication Stewart, J. (Richman, Stewart, Dennis), habeas corpus Affirming district court’s dismissal of second-in-time § 2254 petition as a successive habeas petition, rejecting argument that the fact that the appeal of the denial of the petitioner’s first-in-time § 2254 petition was still pending made his second-in-time petition merely an amendment of the first-in-time … More April 12-15, 2024, opinions
Designated for publication Higginbotham, J. (Higginbotham, Smith, Higginson), Higginson, J., dissenting; product liability Reversing denial of judgment as a matter of law after jury verdict for plaintiff in manufacturing defect case arising from plaintiff’s injury while using propane tank manufactured by defendant, finding insufficient evidence to support the jury verdict, and rendering JMOL for defendant. … More March 21, 2024, opinions
Designated for publication Southwick, J. (Stewart, Dennis, Southwick), receivership Granting petition for panel rehearing of original panel decision that affirmed the district court’s denial of motions for $79 million set-off from order allowing receiver to recover from an investor in Stanford Ponzi scheme, where panel had affirmed on basis that investor had failed to timely … More March 20, 2024, opinions
Designated for publication Duncan, J. (Richman, Haynes, Duncan), Administrative Procedures Act, preemption, healthcare law Affirming in part and reversing in part district court’s judgment that Title X of the Public Health Service Act violates the plaintiff’s constitutional right to consent to the provision of contraceptive care to his minor daughters and that a regulation promulgated … More March 11-12, 2024, opinions
Designated for publication Douglas, J. (Wiener, Willett, Douglas), Wiener, J., dissenting; habeas corpus, ineffective assistance of counsel Affirming district court’s denial of § 2255 petition, holding that petitioner failed to show that he was prejudiced by his trial and appellate counsel’s performance in guilty-plea conviction of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 50 grams … More March 1, 2024, opinions
Designated for publication Jones, J. (Jones, Wilson, Douglas), Jones, J., concurring; habeas corpus, Brady violation, due process Denying motion for permission to file a successive § 2254 petition by capital inmate to urge Brady violations regarding potentially impeaching evidence as to testimony from the petitioner’s girlfriend and due process violations regarding the petitioner’s request for … More February 27, 2024, opinions
Designated for publication per curiam (Jolly, Engelhardt, Oldham), criminal, sentencing, Miranda Affirming conviction and 235-month sentence on drug and firearm offenses. The Court held that the district court did not err in denying a motion to suppress a non-Mirandized statement by the defendant upon his arrest that he had a handgun in his bedroom, because … More February 26, 2024, opinions
Designated for publication Dennis, J. (Stewart, Dennis, Higginson), Higginson, J., dissenting; False Claims Act Affirming dismissal for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction of former employee’s False Claims Act claims against former employer, claiming retaliation for reporting fraudulent misrepresentations made to the Navy, and summary judgment dismissal of remaining claim; holding that “the district court correctly held … More February 14-16, 2024, opinions
