Tag: Fair Housing Act

August 5, 2026, opinions

August 6, 2026

Designated for publication Graves, J. (Wiener, Haynes, Graves) (oral argument), takings, preemption Affirming dismissal of challenges to City’s short-term rentals regulations. New Orleans has enacted a series of ordinances to address the negative effects of short-term rentals (e.g., Airbnb) on residential neighborhoods, including noise, trash, loss of neighborhood character, and reduced affordable housing. A group … More August 5, 2026, opinions

July 20, 2026, opinions

July 21, 2026

Designated for publication per curiam (en banc), Higginson, J., dissenting from grant of en banc rehearing; criminal, Second Amendment, Commerce Clause, en banc Granting en banc rehearing of June 2 panel decision (Clement, Southwick, Engelhardt) that affirmed a conviction of possession of a firearm by a felon, rejecting an as-applied Second Amendment challenge. In a … More July 20, 2026, opinions

July 8-9, 2026, opinions

July 12, 2026

Designated for publication Higginson, J. (Richman, Higginson, Douglas) (no oral argument), qualified immunity Affirming qualified immunity summary judgment dismissal of claim against officer on excessive force claim. On April 27, 2022, Houston police pursued Jalen Randle to execute three felony warrants (aggravated assault, felon in possession of a firearm, and evading arrest). After an immobilization … More July 8-9, 2026, opinions

April 7, 2026, opinions

April 8, 2026

Designated for publication Ho, J. (Haynes, Higginson, Ho) (no oral argument), Higginson, J., dissenting; mandamus, venue, antitrust Granting mandamus to compel the district court to transfer venue to the Northern District of California. Branch Metrics, Inc. sued Google, LLC in the Eastern District of Texas, alleging Sherman Act violations based on documents uncovered during the … More April 7, 2026, opinions

March 30, 2026, opinions

March 31, 2026

Designated for publication Jones, J. (en banc; joined by Elrod, Smith, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, Wilson) (oral argument); Southwick, J., concurring only in the holding that the court has jurisdiction to consider this appeal; Richman, J., concurring in part/dissenting in part; Haynes, J., dissenting (joined by Stewart, Graves, Higginson, Douglas, Ramirez); Higginson, J., dissenting … More March 30, 2026, opinions

March 10, 2025, opinions

March 11, 2025

Designated for publication per curiam (Elrod, Oldham, Wilson), Fair Housing Act, Rule 60(b), notice of appeal Affirming denial of landlord defendant’s Rule 60(b) motion after summary judgment for plaintiff tenant on claims of disability discrimination and retaliation under the Fair Housing Act, finding no abuse of discretion. The Court held that the original summary judgment, … More March 10, 2025, opinions

December 9-13, 2024, opinions

December 16, 2024

Designated for publication Higginson, J. (Smith, Clement, Higginson), criminal, sentencing, sufficiency of evidence, Affirming convictions of substantive healthcare in scheme to defraud TRICARE by ordering unnecessary toxicology and DNA cancer screening tests, finding sufficient evidence to support convictions, finding no plain error in district court’s exclusion of testimony regarding statements purportedly made to defendant by … More December 9-13, 2024, opinions

September 10-12, 2024, opinions

September 13, 2024

Designated for publication per curiam (Jones, Ho, Wilson), Ho, J., concurring; criminal, sentencing On remand from the U.S. Supreme Court, affirming defendant’s conviction of being in possession of a firearm while subject to a domestic violence restraining order; and affirming sentence of 73 months to run consecutively with any state court sentence on pending charges. … More September 10-12, 2024, opinions

November 20, 2023, opinions

November 21, 2023

Designated for publication Higginson, J. (Smith, Higginson, Engelhardt), social security, jurisdiction Affirming the district court’s decision that it did not have jurisdiction over the plaintiff’s claims arising from withholding of benefits. The Court held that it could not have general federal question jurisdiction over claims arising from the Social Security Act, and that the limited … More November 20, 2023, opinions