Designated for publication per curiam (Smith, Southwick, Higginson), criminal, sentencing, Armed Career Criminal Act Affirming 190-month sentence on conviction of possession of a firearm by a felon, as enhanced for under the Armed Career Criminal Act. Teh Court rejected the defendant’s argument that the facts of the prior convictions for purposes of the ACCA enhancement … More September 25, 2023, opinions
Designated for publication Higginson, J. (Jolly, Dennis, Higginson), criminal, sufficiency of evidence Affirming conviction of transporting within the United States an alien who “has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law.” The Court held there was sufficient evidence to support the jury’s finding that the person the defendant was … More September 20-21, 2023, opinions
Unpublished per curiam (Smith, Higginson, Engelhardt), Title VII, employment discrimination, Americans with Disabilities Act Affirming summary judgment dismissal of various employment discrimination claims. per curiam (Stewart, Southwick, Engelhardt), criminal, sentencing Affirming 96-month sentence on conviction of possession of a firearm by a felon. per curiam (Jolly, Engelhardt, Douglas), criminal Granting Anders motion to withdraw, and … More September 18, 2023, opinions
Designated for publication Oldham, J. (Dennis, Engelhardt, Oldham), Title VII, employment discrimination Reversing summary judgment dismissal of employee’s discrimination claims after he was fired for his refusal to cut his hair and beard in violation of his religious vow, in light of Groff v. DeJoy, 143 S. Ct. 2279 (2023). The Court held that the … More September 15, 2023, opinions
Designated for publication Jones, J. (Jones, Stewart, Duncan), criminal, jury instructions, sentencing Affirming conviction of illegal reentry and 105-month sentence, finding no error in jury instruction or impropriety in enhancement of sentence for obstruction of justice. After the defendant had presented evidence that he had been acting under duress due to threats by the drug-smuggling … More September 14, 2023, opinions
Designated for publication Higginson, J. (Smith, Southwick, Higginson), criminal, supervised release Affirming imposition of 15 “standard conditions” for terms of supervised release from district court’s Standing Order, where oral pronouncement included that the supervised release would be “subject to the standard conditions” but did not otherwise expressly articulate those conditions. Elrod, J. (Dennis, Elrod, Ho), … More September 8-11, 2023, opinions
Designated for publication per curiam (Richman, Higginbotham, Southwick), habeas corpus, ineffective assistance of counsel Affirming denial of habeas relief on IAC claims of petitioner convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death. per curiam (en banc court), criminal, sufficiency of evidence Ordering en banc rehearing of June 7, 2023, panel opinion that reversed and vacated … More August 30-31, 2023, opinions
Designated for publication Haynes, J. (Haynes, Engelhardt, deGravelles, by designation), § 1983, sovereign immunity, Ex parte Young Vacating judgment after bench trial in favor of plaintiff on his due process claim arising from Texas state officials’ notification of him that he would have to register as a sex offender under Texas law, and remanding with … More August 24, 2023, opinions
Designated for publication Willett, J. (joined by Richman, Higginbotham, Stewart, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Wilson, Douglas, JJ.), Ho, J., concurring, Jones, J., concurring in judgment only (joined by Smith, Oldham, JJ.); Title VII, employment discrimination Reversing 12(b)(6) dismissal of female correctional officers’ Title VII disparate treatment claim against county for policy … More August 18, 2023, opinions
Designated for publication Dennis, J. (Richman, Dennis, Haynes), qualified immunity, municipal liability Reversing qualified immunity summary judgment on plaintiff’s false arrest claim, but affirming summary judgment on excessive force claim and on municipal liability claim. As to the false arrest claim, the Court held that the arresting officer entered the curtilage of the plaintiff’s property … More August 15, 2023, opinions
