Designated for publication Clement, J. (Clement, Graves, Ramirez), international arbitration Reversing district court’s denial of motion to compel arbitration in international arbitral forum, and remanding for further proceedings. Also, granting in part and denying in part motion to strike reply brief. The Court held that, although arbitral forum designated in parties’ contract had been abolished, … More January 27, 2025, opinions
Designated for publication Hendrix, J. (Jones, Oldham, Hendrix, by designation), criminal, compassionate release Affirming dismissal for lack of jurisdiction over movant’s motion for compassionate release, on basis that the compassionate-release statute does not apply to sentences imposed by the Uniform Code of Military Justice, such that district courts are not empowered to grant compassionate release … More January 8, 2025, opinions
Designated for publication Clement, J. (Smith, Clement, Higginson), breach of contract On breach of contract claim arising from the extension of a lease over a whole tract, rather than a portion, by a bank that managed co-lessor’s interest in a mineral interests on the tract, affirming district court’s judgment that the lease calculated royalty on … More January 6, 2025, opinions
Designated for publication per curiam (Voting AGAINST en banc rehearing: Elrod, Stewart, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Willett, Douglas, Ramirez, JJ.; voting FOR en banc rehearing: Jones, Smith, Richman, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, Wilson, JJ.); qualified immunity Denying en banc rehearing of September 10, 2024, panel opinion (Douglas, J., joined by Wiener, J.; Smith, J., dissenting) … More January 2-5, 2025, opinions
Designated for publication per curiam (Jones, Haynes, Douglas), Jones, J., concurring; Affordable Care Act, Title IX, standing Vacating summary judgment for plaintiffs in challenge to Notification of Interpretation and Enforcement of Section 157 of the ACA, which interpreted discrimination on the basis of sex to include discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and and … More December 16-27, 2024, opinions
Designated for publication Douglas, J. (King, Willett, Douglas), trademark infringement Vacating district court’s amended judgment on remand, and reinstating district court’s prior judgment of injunctive relief as modified by the Court’s prior opinion on March 21, 2024, and by the parties’ stipulated additional language. Richman, J. (Jones, Richman, Ho; not joined by Judge Ho, who … More November 20, 2024, opinions
Designated for publication Jones, J. (Jones, Barksdale, Ho), criminal Affirming conviction of illegal reentry, which resulted in surrender to immigration officials for deportation. The Court rejected the defendant’s argument that the district court had improperly shifted the burden to him to prove the invalidity of the waiver of rights regarding the underlying deportation rather than … More November 8, 2024, opinions
Unpublished per curiam (Clement, Oldham, Wilson), prisoner suit Vacating dismissal of pretrial detainee’s failure-to-protect claim, affirming dismissal of other claims arising from assault, and remanding for further proceedings. per curiam (Wiener, Willett, Duncan), Wiener, J., concurring; municipal liability Affirming dismissal of municipal liability claims arising from tear-gassing and arrest of journalist plaintiff during George Floyd … More November 6, 2024, opinions
Designated for publication Haynes, J. (Southwick, Haynes, Douglas), administrative law Reversing in part and affirming in part district court’s ruling on plaintiff healthcare providers’ and air-ambulance providers’ challenge to HHS rules regarding the No Surprises Act; reversing vacatur of rule regarding how to calculate “qualifying payment amount” under the NSA, affirming vacatur of deadline provision … More October 30, 2024, opinions
Designated for publication Willett, J. (Elrod, Willett, Duncan), habeas corpus Affirming denial of habeas relief, upholding district court’s judgment that the § 2254 petition was untimely. The Court first held that the appeal was timely, based on district court’s determination that the petitioner had placed his request for a “return date” and an extension to … More October 10, 2024, opinions
