January 11, 2023, opinions

Designated for publication Smith, J. (Smith, Haynes, by quorum); attorneys’ fees, breach of fiduciary duty Affirming summary judgment in favor of defendants on plaintiffs’ claims for breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, and conspiracy to commit theft, and affirming award of attorneys’ fees. The district court awarded summary judgment to J.P. Morgan entities on the plaintiffs’ … More January 11, 2023, opinions

January 10, 2023, opinions

Designated for publication Clement, J. (Smith, Clement, Haynes), Haynes, J., dissenting; Title VII, employment discrimination Affirming summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s claims that he was not adequately trained for the testing that would determine if he would be retained or fired from Exxon’s polypropylene manufacturing facility because he was Black. The Court first held, differently from … More January 10, 2023, opinions

January 9, 2023, opinions

Designated for publication per curiam (Smith, Southwick, Douglas), criminal, restitution Affirming the denial of a motion for adjustment of a restitution order, holding that an inmate’s $1400 stimulus payment under the American Rescue Plan Act was not exempt from being applied toward a restitution order. Unpublished per curiam (King, Stewart, Haynes), criminal, guilty plea Affirming … More January 9, 2023, opinions

January 3-6, 2023, opinions

Catching up from traveling, so summaries of published opinions will not include the usual detail. Designated for publication Elrod, J. (joined by Richman, Jones, Smith, Stewart, Southwick, Haynes, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, Wilson, JJ.); Haynes, J. (joined by Richman, C.J.), concurring in judgment only; Ho, J. (joined by Richman, Southwick, JJ.), concurring in part … More January 3-6, 2023, opinions

December 28-30, 2022, opinions

Designated for publication Southwick, J. (Higginbotham, Southwick, Higginson), appellate jurisdiction Dismissing appeal from denial of motion to quash grand jury subpoenas and compelling compliance with a grand jury subpoena. The Court held that “[t]here is no jurisdiction for appeals challenging a grand jury subpoena for production of documents unless (1) the appellant has been held … More December 28-30, 2022, opinions

December 27, 2022, opinions

Unpublished per curiam (Wiener, Elrod, Engelhardt), criminal Granting Anders motion to withdraw, and dismissing appeal. per curiam (Higginbotham, Jones, Oldham), breach of contract Dismissing appeal for lack of timely notice of appeal.

December 23, 2022, opinions

Unpublished per curiam (Smith, Barksdale, Haynes), breach of contract, sanctions Affirming summary judgment in favor of defendant in breach of contract dispute arising from agreements to transfer hotel properties; denying plaintiff’s motion for sanctions; granting defendants’ motion for Rule 38 sanctions for a frivolous appeal; and remanding for calculation of amount of sanctions award. per … More December 23, 2022, opinions

December 21-22, 2022, opinions

Designated for publication Graves, J. (Graves, Willett, Engelhardt), insurance Affirming declaratory judgment in favor of insurance company that it did not owe coverage or defense to its insured for damages incurred by insured’s employees. Southwick, J. (Higginbotham, Southwick, Higginson), excessive force, municipal liability Reversing 12(b)(6) dismissal of excessive force claims against officer who punched plaintiff … More December 21-22, 2022, opinions

December 20, 2022, opinions

Unpublished per curiam (Jones, Smith, Graves), intellectual property Affirming judgment in favor of Lisa Fodera declaring her the lawful owner of Julian Jackson’s 50% interest in the Ohio Players’ music rights. per curiam (Jones, Smith, Graves), immigration Denying in part and dismissing in part Cameroonian citizen’s petition for review of BIA order denying motion for … More December 20, 2022, opinions

December 19, 2022, opinions

Designated for publication Southwick, J. (Jones, Southwick, Ho), criminal, sufficiency of evidence, search and seizure Affirming in part, reversing in part, and remanding; affirming conviction of _________; reversing conviction of for insufficient evidence; and remanding for Government to elect between overlapping counts of ________. The Court found no reversible error in the district court’s denial … More December 19, 2022, opinions