February 2, 2026, opinions

Designated for publication Douglas, J. (Dennis, Oldham, Douglas) (oral argument), Oldham, J., dissenting; maritime law Affirming issuance of maritime lien against vessel to secure payment for marine fuel oil bunkers. The dispute centers on an unpaid delivery of marine fuel (“bunkers”) to the Liberian-flagged cargo vessel ARGOS M. Three Fifty Markets, a UK-based commodity trading … More February 2, 2026, opinions

November 24, 2025, opinions

Designated for publication Duncan, J. (Smith, Graves, Duncan) (no oral argument), diversity jurisdiction, commercial litigation Affirming that diversity jurisdiction exists, and affirming summary judgment for lender/plaintiff holding defendants liable as guarantors for loans made by Appellees Cadence Bank and Century Bank. The Banks made two large loans to Bridgelink Engineering LLC (which the Johnsons managed) … More November 24, 2025, opinions

June 20-21, 2024, opinions

Designated for publication Southwick, J. (Richman, Southwick, Oldham), election law, sovereign immunity Reversing district court’s denial of District Attorney’s motion to dismiss constitutional claims of voters and others challenging recent amendments to Texas election laws, holding that District Attorney is entitled to sovereign immunity; vacating denial of motion to dismiss for lack of standing; and … More June 20-21, 2024, opinions

June 4, 2024, opinions

Designated for publication Wilson, J. (Clement, Engelhardt, Wilson), commercial litigation Affirming summary judgment in favor of bank, holding that Mississippi law allowed a loan guaranty to be transferred from original lender and that guarantor could not assert equitable defenses belonging to the borrower. Unpublished per curiam (Dennis, Elrod, Ho), mineral law After receiving response from … More June 4, 2024, opinions

Take the Fifth: Oct. 2, 2020 opinions

Basic Capital Management, Inc. v. Dynex Capital, Inc., et al., 19-11272, appeal from N.D. Tex., designated for publication King, J. (King, Stewart, Southwick), commercial, fraudulent transfer, alter ego, limitations, res judicata Affirming 12(b)(6) dismissal on time-bar and res judicata grounds of plaintiffs’ complaint asserting claims fraudulent transfer and alter ego. Plaintiffs had gained a $55 … More Take the Fifth: Oct. 2, 2020 opinions