Take the Fifth

Continuing with trying something new here, recording observations from the questions asked at the January en banc sitting. And, contrary to my protest otherwise yesterday, I am giving in to the temptation to try some predictions hunches on the decisions the arguments might lead to, based on the questions and on the judges’ prior inclinations … More En banc observations: Holberg (habeas/Brady) and Airlines for America (airline-fee rulemaking); also, adding some hunches

Trying something new here at Take the Fifth, sitting in to observe en banc arguments and provide quick-take observations. Reading the tea-leaves of an argument to predict outcomes is rarely a fruitful exercise even with a three-judge panel, certainly not with a 17-judge en banc panel; but the judges’ questions nevertheless are fertile ground for … More En banc argument observations: Roake and Nathan (10 Commandments)

One of the eight cases getting en banc treatment this week, Spectrum WT v. Wendler, 23-10994, currently set for the Friday morning argument on January 23, may be going by the wayside. This morning, the plaintiff-appellant, Spectrum WT, filed a motion to dismiss its appeal as moot (Spectrum prevailed at the panel stage, though that … More One en banc case to drop from calendar?

A very busy en banc calendar for the Fifth Circuit in January 2026, with eight cases being heard on January 20-23. Below I’ll re-run my summaries of the original panel opinions in the cases, so everyone can see the dynamics running in the case between majority, concurring, and dissenting opinions (most of these featured contrasting … More January 2026 en banc previews