All the January Fifth Circuit En Banc Observations

Even with one of the en banc arguments canceled and the appeal dismissed for mootness, this was still an en banc sitting for the Fifth Circuit record books. Seven cases heard in six en banc arguments (the two 10 Commandments cases having been consolidated for oral argument only), and on a holiday-shortened week, at that. … More All the January Fifth Circuit En Banc Observations

En banc observations: U.S. v. Texas and W.M.M. v. Trump (immigration day)

While observing en banc oral arguments today at the Fifth Circuit, it was hard not to have the driving riff of Led Zeppelin’s “Immigrant Song” on repeat in my head, because today was definitely immigration day. It also was a day of driving riffs, because three out of the four advocates today were the best … More En banc observations: U.S. v. Texas and W.M.M. v. Trump (immigration day)

En banc observations: Holberg (habeas/Brady) and Airlines for America (airline-fee rulemaking); also, adding some hunches

Continuing with trying something new here, recording observations from the questions asked at the January en banc sitting. And, contrary to my protest otherwise yesterday, I am giving in to the temptation to try some predictions hunches on the decisions the arguments might lead to, based on the questions and on the judges’ prior inclinations … More En banc observations: Holberg (habeas/Brady) and Airlines for America (airline-fee rulemaking); also, adding some hunches

En banc argument observations: Roake and Nathan (10 Commandments)

Trying something new here at Take the Fifth, sitting in to observe en banc arguments and provide quick-take observations. Reading the tea-leaves of an argument to predict outcomes is rarely a fruitful exercise even with a three-judge panel, certainly not with a 17-judge en banc panel; but the judges’ questions nevertheless are fertile ground for … More En banc argument observations: Roake and Nathan (10 Commandments)

Interesting CLE seminar thoughts

Pardon the ambiguity in the headline, there–the CLE seminar was what was “interesting,” not necessarily my thoughts about the seminar, but this CLE seminar was quite thought-provoking. Today was the LSBA’s annual Advanced Appellate Practice Seminar; as always, seminar chairs Thomas Flanagan and Rick Stanley did an excellent job putting together dynamic panels. And, as … More Interesting CLE seminar thoughts