Category: Take the Fifth

February 5, 2025, opinions

February 12, 2025

Unpublished per curiam (Higginbotham, Willett, Ho), breach of contract Affirming summary judgment for defendant helicopter manufacturer on breach of contract, breach of implied duty, and quantum meruit claims by helicopter sales company. per curiam (Wiener, Ho, Ramirez), criminal Granting Anders motion to withdraw, and dismissing appeal. per curiam (King, Southwick, Engelhardt), criminal Granting Anders motion … More February 5, 2025, opinions

February 3-4, 2025, opinions

February 11, 2025

Designated for publication per curiam (Elrod, Dennis, Higginson), habeas corpus, Armed Career Criminal Act Vacating dismissal of § 2255 petition challenging ACCA-enhanced sentencing, on the basis that a new decision from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals that abrogated prior Fifth Circuit precedent that Texas-law robbery by threat and aggravated robbery by threat qualified as … More February 3-4, 2025, opinions

January 31, 2025, opinions

February 1, 2025

Designated for publication per curiam (voting against rehearing en banc: Elrod, Jones, Smith, Stewart, Richman, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Willett, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, Wilson, Douglas, Ramirez, JJ.; voting for rehearing en banc: Ho, J.–yes, a 16-1 vote againt rehearing en banc); Duncan, J., concurring in denial of rehearing (joined by Jones, Smith, Willett, Oldham, Engelhardt, … More January 31, 2025, opinions

January 30, 2025, opinions

January 31, 2025

Designated for publication Jones, J. (Elrod, Jones, Barksdale), Second Amendment Reversing district court’s judgment that a 1968 federal statute prohibiting sale of handguns to 18- to 20-year-old adults was not unconstitutional and finding the ban is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment; overruling Court’s precedent from National Rifle Association, Inc. v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, … More January 30, 2025, opinions

January 29, 2025, opinions

January 30, 2025

Designated for publication Southwick, J. (Southwick, Haynes, Douglas), Haynes, J., dissenting; insurance Affirming summary judgment for insurer on dispute over interpretation of flood deductible provision in builder’s risk insurance policy. The Court held that the district court did not err in resolving the ambiguity in summary judgment review of extrinsic evidence where the insured had … More January 29, 2025, opinions

January 28, 2025, opinions

January 29, 2025

Designated for publication per curiam (voting against rehearing: Elrod, Stewart, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Willett, Engelhardt, Wilson, Douglas, Ramirez, JJ.; voting for rehearing: Jones, Smith, Richman, Ho, Duncan, Oldham, JJ.), Ho, J., dissenting from denial of rehearing; Oldham, J. (joined by Jones, Smith, Duncan, JJ.), dissenting from denial of rehearing; prisoner suit, appellate jurisdiction, en … More January 28, 2025, opinions

January 27, 2025, opinions

January 29, 2025

Designated for publication Clement, J. (Clement, Graves, Ramirez), international arbitration Reversing district court’s denial of motion to compel arbitration in international arbitral forum, and remanding for further proceedings. Also, granting in part and denying in part motion to strike reply brief. The Court held that, although arbitral forum designated in parties’ contract had been abolished, … More January 27, 2025, opinions

January 23-26, 2025, opinions

January 29, 2025

Designated for publication Wilson, J. (Davis, Graves, Wilson), administrative law Affirming dismissal of plaintiffs’ claims challenging as applied to them the use of a Total Per Capita Cost measure as part of the government defendants’ Merit-Based Incentive Payment System for purposes of adjustment of Medicare reimbursement rates, finding that plaintiffs’ regulatory challenge was statutorily barred. … More January 23-26, 2025, opinions

January 17-22, 2025, opinions

January 29, 2025

Designated for publication Southwick, J. (Southwick, Haynes, Douglas), Haynes, J., concurring; habeas corpus Affirming dismissal of § 2254 application based on holding that state court’s decision was not contrary to or an unreasonable application of clearly established Supreme Court precedent, when the state court determined that false testimony from the sole identifying witness regarding his … More January 17-22, 2025, opinions