Designated for publication Davis, J. (Davis, Jones, Stewart) (no oral argument), criminal Affirming conviction of possession of a firearm by a felon. Lester Landrum pleaded guilty but preserved constitutional challenges to the statute, arguing that it violates the Second Amendment (both facially and as applied), the Equal Protection Clause, the Commerce Clause, and that it … More March 4-5, 2026, opinions
Designated for publication Graves, J. (Clement, Graves, Ho) (oral argument), breach of contract, choice of law, indemnification, attorneys’ fees Affirming in part and vacating in part summary judgment for plaintiff on claim for indemnification for lawsuits arising from alleged fraudulent over-billing, and affirming in part and vacating in part award of attorneys’ fees, and remanding. … More March 3, 2026, opinions
Designated for publication per curiam (Clement, Douglas, Ramirez) (no oral argument), criminal, sentencing Affirming 71-month sentence for conviction of conspiracy to transport aliens and transporting aliens, by applying sentencing enhancement for transporting an unaccompanied minor. Luis Francisco Corona-Montano was convicted for conspiracy to transport aliens and transporting aliens after he picked up a group of … More March 2, 2026, opinions
Designated for publication per curiam (voting for en banc rehearing: Jones, Smith, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham; voting against en banc rehearing: Elrod, Stewart, Richman, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Willett, Wilson, Douglas, Ramirez), Jones, J., dissenting from denial of en banc rehearing (joined by Smith, Ho, Duncan, Oldham), Higginson, J., concurring in denial of en banc … More February 27, 2026, opinions
Designated for publication Elrod, C.J. (Elrod, Clement, Haynes) (oral argument), Telephone Consumer Protection Act Affirming summary judgment dismissal of TCPA claim. Bradford sued, claiming that prerecorded calls the company made to his cell phone violated the TCPA because they lacked “prior express written consent” and constituted telemarketing. The panel held that (1) the TCPA itself … More February 25-26, 2026, opinions
Designated for publication per curiam (Smith, Richman, Graves) (oral argument), free exercise, mootness On receiving an answer of “no” from the Texas Supreme Court on the certified question of whether Texas’s Code of Judicial Conduct prohibited judges from publicly refusing to perform same-sex weddings while continuing to perform opposite-sex weddings, holding that the suit was … More February 24, 2026, opinions
Designated for publication Smith, J. (Smith, Richman; Dennis on argument panel, but decision decided on a quorum due to Judge Dennis taking inactive status) (oral argument); qualified immunity Reversing denial of qualified immunity defense to officer defendant on plaintiff’s § 1983 Fourth Amendment search claim, and rendering judgment of dismissal. In this 42 U.S.C. § … More February 23, 2026, opinions
Designated for publication per curiam (en banc; Elrod, Stewart, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Willett, Douglas, Ramirez, voting against en banc rehearing; Jones, Smith, Richman, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, Wilson, voting for en banc rehearing) (oral argument at panel stage), Ho, J., dissenting from denial of en banc rehearing (joined by Jones, Smith); en banc, qualified … More February 20, 2026, opinions
Designated for publication Elrod, C.J. (Elrod, Smith, Wilson) (oral argument withdrawn), artificial intelligence, sanctions After unpublished per curiam opinion entered January 6, 2026, vacating sanctions order against plaintiff on Fair Credit Reporting Act claim, the Court of Appeals issued an order for the plaintiff’s counsel to show cause why the Court of Appeals should not … More February 18-19, 2026, opinions
Unpublished decisions per curiam (Richman, Southwick, Willett) (no oral argument), Federal Tort Claims Act, service of process Affirming dismissal of FTCA claim for lack of sufficient service of process. per curiam (Stewart, Graves, Oldham) (no oral argument), criminal, sentencing Affirming conviction and sentence for illegal reentry. per curiam (Smith, Haynes, Oldham) (no oral argument), § … More February 16, 2026, opinions
